🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed positions for Indigenous council members on NZ councils is set to be slashed by over 50%, following a divisive legislative amendment that required local governments to submit the future of hard-won Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which can include one or more elected officials depending on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the choice to elect a assured Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Originally, councils were only able to create a Māori ward by initially putting it to a community referendum in their area. Communities often spent years building local support and pushing their local governments to establish Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the former administration permitted municipal authorities to set up a Māori ward without initially mandating them to put it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, stating local residents should decide whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation required local authorities that had established a electoral district under Labour’s rules to hold decisive public votes alongside the municipal polls, which ended on 11 October. Of 42 councils participating in the referendum, 17 voted to retain their seats, and 25 to disestablish theirs – revealing many regions opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes provided “a vital step in reinstating local democratic control.”

Critics nevertheless have criticised the new policy as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the coalition government has implemented extensive reversals to policies intended to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has said it wants to terminate “race-based” policies, and says it is dedicated to enhancing results for Māori and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

The results of the referendums were divided down urban-rural lines – six of the seven urban centers required to vote backed Māori wards, while rural regions leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had only just come in – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

The recent local government elections registered the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with under one-third of citizens participating, leading to calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are permitted to create other types of electoral districts – such as rural wards – without first requiring a public vote. The disparate requirements applied to Indigenous representation indicated the administration was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This statement concerned the 17 areas that voted to keep their wards.